surguvestВестник Сургутского государственного университетаSurgut State University Journal2949-3455Сургутский государственный университет10.34822/2312-3419-2021-1-57-64surguvest-567Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИECONOMICSОЦЕНКА ГЕНДЕРНЫХ РАЗЛИЧИЙ, ХАРАКТЕРНЫХ ДЛЯ ЗАВЕРШИВШИХ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЕЙEVALUATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES TYPICAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS WHO TERMINATED ACTIVITIESПиньковецкаяЮ. С.PinkovetskayaYu. S.

кандидат экономических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры экономического анализа и государственного управления

E-mail: judy54@yandex.ru

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Docent, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Analysis and State Management

E-mail: judy54@yandex.ru

Ульяновский государственный университет, УльяновскРоссияUlyanovsk State University, UlyanovskRussian Federation20213103202101 (31)Вестник Сургутского государственного университета5764Copyright © Пиньковецкая Ю.С., 20212021Пиньковецкая Ю.С.Pinkovetskaya Y.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.surguvest.ru/jour/article/view/567

Целью исследования является оценка сложившихся уровней завершения женщинами и мужчинами деятельности в качестве предпринимателей в современных национальных экономиках. Были решены задачи определения значений показателей, характеризующих завершение предпринимателями деятельности, а также рассмотрено влияние на этот процесс таких причин, как убыточность производства и отсутствие финансов. В качестве исходной информации использовались результаты опросов, проведенных в 59 странах в процессе реализации проекта Глобального мониторинга предпринимательства. Полученные результаты показали, что в большинстве стран имеет место гендерный разрыв между удельными весами женщин-предпринимателей, завершивших деятельность, в численности взрослых женщин и соответствующими показателями по мужчинам-предпринимателям. Доказано, что почти половина мужчин и женщин в рассматриваемых странах завершили свой бизнес в связи с отсутствием прибыли или финансовыми проблемами.

The aim of the study is to assess the current levels of termination of entrepreneurial activity by women and men in modern national economies. The study solved the problem of determining the values of indicators that characterize the termination of an entrepreneur's activity, as well as the impact on this process of such factors as unprofitability of production and lack of finance. The study used the results of surveys con-ducted in 59 countries during the implementation of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor project as initial information. The results showed that in most countries there is a gender gap between the proportion of adult female entrepreneurs who have terminated their activities and the corresponding indicators for male entre-preneurs. It is proven that almost half of men and women in the countries under review have closed their business due to lack of profit or financial problems.

завершение предпринимательской деятельностиженщинымужчиныгендерные различияубыточность бизнесафинансовые проблемы.termination of entrepreneurial activitywomenmengender differencesunprofitability of businessfinancial problems.ReferencesKraemer-Eis H., Lang F., Torfs W., Gvetadze S. European Small Business Finance Outlook. EIF Working Paper 2017/43. June. 2017. URL: https://www.eif.org/ news_centre/publications/eif_wp_43.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).Kraemer-Eis H., Lang F., Torfs W., Gvetadze S. European Small Business Finance Outlook. EIF Working Paper 2017/43. June. 2017. URL: https://www.eif.org/ news_centre/publications/eif_wp_43.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).Cardon M. S., Stevens С. E., Potter D. R. Misfortunes or Mistakes? Cultural Sensemaking of Entrepreneurial Failure // Journal of Business Venturing. 2011. Vol. 26 (1). P. 79–92.Cardon M. S., Stevens С. E., Potter D. R. Misfortunes or Mistakes? Cultural Sensemaking of Entrepreneurial Failure // Journal of Business Venturing. 2011. Vol. 26 (1). P. 79–92.Cefis E., Marsili O. Born to Flip. Exit Decisions of Entrepreneurial Firms in High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2011. Vol. 21(3). P. 473–498.Cefis E., Marsili O. Born to Flip. Exit Decisions of Entrepreneurial Firms in High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2011. Vol. 21(3). P. 473–498.De Tienne D., McKelvie A., Chandler G. Making Sense of Entrepreneurial Exit Strategies: A Typology and Test // Journal of Business Venturing. 2015. Vol. 30 (2). P. 255–272.De Tienne D., McKelvie A., Chandler G. Making Sense of Entrepreneurial Exit Strategies: A Typology and Test // Journal of Business Venturing. 2015. Vol. 30 (2). P. 255–272.Box M. The Death of Firms: Exploring the Effects of Environment and Birth Cohort on Firm Survival in Sweden // Small Business Economics. 2008. № 31. P. 379–393.Box M. The Death of Firms: Exploring the Effects of Environment and Birth Cohort on Firm Survival in Sweden // Small Business Economics. 2008. № 31. P. 379–393.Coad A. Death is Not a Success: Reflections on Business Exit // International Small Business Journal. 2014. Vol. 32 (7). P. 721–732.Coad A. Death is Not a Success: Reflections on Business Exit // International Small Business Journal. 2014. Vol. 32 (7). P. 721–732.Ucbasaran D., Shepherd D. A., Lockett A., Lyon S. J. Life after Business Failure: The Process and Consequences of Business Failure for Entrepreneurs // Journal of Management. 2012. Vol. 39 (1). P. 163–202.Ucbasaran D., Shepherd D. A., Lockett A., Lyon S. J. Life after Business Failure: The Process and Consequences of Business Failure for Entrepreneurs // Journal of Management. 2012. Vol. 39 (1). P. 163–202.Wennberg K., De Tienne D. What Do We Really Mean When We Talk About „Exit‟? A Critical Review of Research on Entrepreneurial Exit // International Small Business Journal. 2014. Vol. 32 (1). P. 4–16.Wennberg K., De Tienne D. What Do We Really Mean When We Talk About „Exit‟? A Critical Review of Research on Entrepreneurial Exit // International Small Business Journal. 2014. Vol. 32 (1). P. 4–16.Carlianne P., Stephens H., Weinstein A. Where are All the Self-Employed Women? Push and Pull Factors In-fluencing Female Labor Market Decisions // Small Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 46 (3). P. 365–390.Carlianne P., Stephens H., Weinstein A. Where are All the Self-Employed Women? Push and Pull Factors In-fluencing Female Labor Market Decisions // Small Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 46 (3). P. 365–390.Chhabra M., Karmarkar Y. Gender Gap in Entrepre-neurship – a Study of Small and Micro Enterprises // ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2016. Vol. 6 (8). P. 82–99.Chhabra M., Karmarkar Y. Gender Gap in Entrepre-neurship – a Study of Small and Micro Enterprises // ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2016. Vol. 6 (8). P. 82–99.Fairlie R. W., Robb A. M. Gender Differences in Business Performance: Evidence from the Characteristics of Business Owners Survey // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 375–395.Fairlie R. W., Robb A. M. Gender Differences in Business Performance: Evidence from the Characteristics of Business Owners Survey // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 375–395.Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018/2019 Women‟s Entrepreneurship Report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). London Business School, London, United Kingdom. 2019. 108 p.Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018/2019 Women‟s Entrepreneurship Report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). London Business School, London, United Kingdom. 2019. 108 p.Pinkovetskaia I., Slepova V. Estimation of Fixed Capital Investment in SMEs: the Existing Differentiation in the Russian Federation // Business Systems Research. 2018. Vol. 9 (1). P. 65–78.Pinkovetskaia I., Slepova V. Estimation of Fixed Capital Investment in SMEs: the Existing Differentiation in the Russian Federation // Business Systems Research. 2018. Vol. 9 (1). P. 65–78.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.