Implementation of the resource saving concept within rural areas
https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3455-2024-3-2
Abstract
The increasing relevance of the problem of efficient resource utilization can be attributed to the popularity of sustainable development and the challenges posed by biological, climatic, and geopolitical factors, all of which are connected to society’s perception of crucial elements of the natural environment like land, water resources, and air. Specifically focused on rural areas, the research presented in this article examines the issues of effective resource utilization. The main scientific conclusion proposed in the work is that resource saving is an inevitable consequence of the negative manifestations of climate change, which entails positive effects for agricultural producers and the rural population, largely depends, first, on the motivation of rural entrepreneurs, secondly, on the state initiatives recorded in institutional documents, thirdly, on the preferences of rural communities and their active participation in the implementation of the concept under consideration.
About the Authors
S. G. Golovina
Ural State Agrarian University, Yekaterinburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Chief Researcher
L. V. Zubareva
Surgut State University, Surgut
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor
E. V. Abilova
Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Docent
References
1. Arora N. K. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions // Environmental Sustainability. 2019. No. 2. P. 95–96.
2. Xiaoman W., Majeed A., Vasbieva D. G. et al. Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: advancing sustainable development agenda // Sustainable Development. 2021. Vol. 29, no. 5. Р. 1037–1048.
3. Bublitz A., Keles D., Zimmermann F. et al. A survey on electricity market design: insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms // Energy Economics. 2019. Vol. 80. P. 1059–1078.
4. Schulz H. Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment // Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2012. Vol. 175, no. 3. Р. 410–422.
5. Feng Y., Dawei W., Linlin Z. et al. Efficiency evaluation for regional industrial water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: a dynamic interactive network slacks-based measure model // Journal of Environmental Management. 2021. Vol. 279, no. 6. P. 111721.
6. Chen Y., Yang R., Wong C. W. Y. Efficiency and productivity of air pollution control in Chinese cities // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022. No. 76. Р. 103423.
7. Hanaček K., Rodríguez-Labajos B. Impacts of land-use and management changes on cultural agroecosystem services and environmental conflicts – A Global Review // Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018. No. 50. Р. 41–59.
8. Сведения о текущих затратах на охрану окружающей среды за 2023 год / Росстат. М., 2024. 34 с.URL: https://clck.ru/3AkzPX ( дата обращения: 14.07.2024).
9. Сведения о текущих затратах на охрану окружающей среды и экологических платежах за 2014 год / Росстат. М., 2015. 67 с. URL: https://clck.ru/3AkzSY (дата обращения: 14.07.2024).
10. Бикметов Е. Ю., Амирханова Л. Р. Управление экологизацией социохозяйственной деятельности как условие устойчивого развития // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Социально-экономические науки. 2023. № 4. С. 198–208.
11. Katsumasa T., O’Neill B. C. The Paris agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5 °C and 2 °C temperature targets // Nature Climate Change. 2018. Vol. 8, no. 4. Р. 319–324.
12. Lurie S., Brekken C. A. The role of local agriculture in the New Natural Resource Economy (NNRE) for rural economic development // Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2019. Vol. 34, no. 5. P. 395–405.
13. Стратегия экологической безопасности Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года : проект Министерства природных ресурсов и экологии Российской Федерации. М., 2015. 37 с. URL: https://burondt.ru/NDT/NDTDocsFileDownload.php?UrlId=491 (дата обращения: 14.07.2024).
14. Alston J. M., Pardey P. G. The economics of agricultural innovation // Handbook of Agricultural Economics. 2021. No. 5. P. 3895–3980.
15. Dalezios N. R., Blanta A., Spyropoulos N. V. et al. Risk identification of agricultural drought for sustainable agroecosystems // Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2014. Vol. 14, no. 9. Р. 2435–2448.
16. Земельный потенциал России: состояние, проблемы и меры по его рациональному использованию и охране : аналитическая записка Российской академии наук. М., 2023. 70 с. URL: https://clck.ru/3AkzY4 (дата обращения: 14.07.2024).
17. Farooq M., Hussain M., Ul-Allah S. et al. Physiological and agronomic approaches for improving wateruse efficiency in crop plants // Agricultural Water Management. 2019. No. 219. Р. 95–108.
18. Grafton R. Q., Williams J., Jiang Q. Food and Water Gaps to 2050: Preliminary Results from the Global Food and Water System (GFWS) Platform // Food Security. 2015. No. 7. Р. 209–220.
19. Bulturbayevich M. B., Jurayevich M. B. The impact of the digital economy on economic growth // International Journal of Business, Law, and Education. 2020. Vol. 1, no. 1. Р. 4–7.
20. Ahmad M., Jiang P., Majeed A. et al. The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An Advanced Panel Data Estimation // Resources Policy. 2020. No. 69. Р. 101817.
21. Вершинская М. Е., Шабанов В. В., Маркин В. Н. Эколого-водохозяйственная оценка водных систем: моногр. М. : РГАУ-МСХА, 2016. 144 с.
22. Baù M., Chirico F., Pittino D. et al. Roots to grow: family firms and local embeddedness in rural and urban contexts // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2019. No. 43 (2). Р. 360–385.
23. Головина С. Г., Абилова Е. В., Миколайчик И. Н. Участие фермеров и местных сообществ в реализации политики поддержки сельских территорий в странах Европейского Союза // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. 2022. № 4. С. 52–60.
24. Ouyang Z., Zheng H., Xiao Y. et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital // Science. 2016. No. 352. P. 1455–1459.
Review
For citations:
Golovina S.G., Zubareva L.V., Abilova E.V. Implementation of the resource saving concept within rural areas. Surgut State University Journal. 2024;12(3):26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3455-2024-3-2
Views:
72
Email this article 