Preview

Surgut State University Journal

Advanced search

Platform economy: Impact on labor and employment

https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3455-2025-4-6

Abstract

The paper examines the platform economy, its impact on labor and employment. The principal topics in the literature that cause scientific discussion are highlighted: what platforms are, regulation of platform employment, and issues related to the forms and levels of risk and benefits gained by independent contractors, platforms, employers. Platforms function as a new type of management (new economic architecture), a new form of labor organization, intermediary firms, and dispatchers. The new type of management also changes the nature of labor. Thus, typologies of platform workers are analyzed: by skill levels (professional knowledge, responsibility and authority) and type of products manufactured; by he nature of he work performed and territorial affiliation. Platform type of management, specifically the typology of employment and the management of task execution (algorithmically controlled work environment), distinguishes platform employment from traditional employment. Given the rise of platform employment and the unregulated relations between platforms and contractors (which are described as business-to-business), platforms are providing social support to contractors, including a guaranteed hourly wage, discounts on products, and tips.

About the Author

E. L. Filatova
Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen
Russian Federation

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Docent



References

1. Андрей Исаев: Законопроект « Единой России» о платформенной занятости будет внесён в Госдуму в марте. URL: https://er.ru/activity/news/andrejisaev-zakonoproekt-edinoj-rossii-o-platformennojzanyatosti-budet-vnesyon-v-gosdumu-v-marte (дата обращения: 06.06.2025).

2. Логинова Е. В., Злотников М. С. Гиг-экономика и ее влияние на человеческий капитал // Московский экономический журнал. 2022. № 10. С. 688–695.

3. Варавва М. Ю., Лазарева О. С. Платформенная гиг-экономика – альтернативная модель с нестандартными трудовыми отношениями // Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова. 2022. Т. 19, № 5. С. 108–115. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-108-115.

4. Синявская О. В., Бирюкова С. С., Аптекарь А. П. и др. Платформенная занятость: определение и регулирование. М. : НИУ ВШЭ, 2021. 77 с.

5. Allon G., Cohen M. C., Sinchaisri W. P. The impact of behavioral and economic drivers on gig economy workers // Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2023. Vol. 25, no. 4. P. 1376–1393. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1191.

6. Wood A. J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V. et al. Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy // Work, Employment and Society. 2019. Vol. 33, no. 1. P. 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.

7. Трудовой кодекс Российской Федерации от 30.12.2001 № 197-ФЗ ( ред. от 21.07.2025) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 01.09.2025). Доступ из СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

8. Banik N., Padalkar M. The spread of gig economy: Trends and effects // Форсайт. 2021. Vol. 15, no. 1. P. 19–29.

9. Vallas S., Schor J. B. What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy // Annual Review of Sociology. 2020. Vol. 46. P. 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.

10. Barratt T., Goods C., Veen A. ‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’worker agency in the Australian gig-economy // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2020. Vol. 52, no. 8. P. 1643–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20914346.

11. Синявская О. В., Бирюкова С. С., Горват Е. С. и др. Платформенная занятость в России: масштабы, мотивы и барьеры участия : аналит. доклад. М. : НИУ ВШЭ, 2022. 29 с.

12. Статистика для национального проекта « Малое и среднее предпринимательство и поддержка индивидуальной предпринимательской инициативы». URL: https://rmsp.nalog.ru/statistics2.html?ysclid=lu06t96i7v576129372 (дата обращения: 07.06.2025).

13. Newlands G. Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space // Organization Studies. 2021. Vol. 42, no. 5. P. 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900.

14. Ichino P. A new labour law for platform workers and umbrella companies // Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation. 2018. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.12.2.0012.

15. Moore P. V. E(a)ffective precarity, control and resistance in the digitalised workplace // Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data / Chandler D., Fuchs C., eds. London : University of Westminster Press, 2019. P. 125–144. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/11935.

16. Bucher E. L., Schou P. K., Waldkirch M. Pacifying the algorithm–Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy // Organization. 2021. Vol. 28, no. 1. P. 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531.

17. Яндекс Еда. URL: https://eda.yandex.ru/partner/rabota/tyumen (дата обращения: 07.06.2025).

18. Святенко рассказала о разработке законопроекта о платформенной занятости. URL: https://www.pnp.ru/social/svyatenko-rasskazala-o-razrabotke-zakonoproekta-o-platformennoy-zanyatosti.html ( дата обращения: 06.06.2025).


Review

For citations:


Filatova E.L. Platform economy: Impact on labor and employment. Surgut State University Journal. 2025;13(4):64-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3455-2025-4-6

Views: 83


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-3455 (Online)