THEORETICAL AND METHODICAL BASE FOR STUDYING DIGITAL INCLUSION IN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.35266/2312-3419-2023-2-46-60
Abstract
The aim of the article is to develop the theoretical and methodological base for studying digital inclusion and to identify the distinguishing features of its manifestation in Russian settings. The authors propose an approach to studying digital inclusion by determining the causes and factors of its development in Russia. Macroeconomic analysis of territorial and age-related factors of digital inclusion development in Russia is conducted based on the official statistics indicators that define the features of access to the Internet for the population, directions for digital technology use, digital skills in the popula-tion, etc. The territorial factor was found to be a key cause for the development of digital inclusion in Rus-sia. It displays through a more accessible Internet and possibilities to use the potential of digital technolo-gy for the population in urban areas rather than for those who live in rural areas and territories remote from the “growth areas”. The article identifies features of the age factor affecting the development of digi-tal inclusion in Russia and changes in the dynamics of the age factor affecting the development of digital inclusion during the pandemic. The analysis allowed the authors to substantiate the directions of positive practice in developing digital inclusion in Russia in order to overcome the digital divide both on the na-tional business level and on the international level. The theoretical and methodological basis for further research in the field is presented in the obtained conclusions. It can be used for improving the state policy on digital development and the implementation of strategic directions for the digitalization of the Russian national economy.
About the Authors
S. V. PlyasovaRussian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Docent
E-mail: splyasova@yandex.ru
S. V. Yazykova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Economics)
E-mail: sv.yaz@bk.ru
E. V. Konishchev
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer
E-mail: 9204770299@mail.ru
I. V. Araslanbaev
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Docent
E-mail: irek302@mail.ru
References
1. Плотичкина Н. В. Цифровая инклюзия: теоретическая рефлексия и публичная политика // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 58. С. 216–226.
2. Arroyo L. Implications of digital inclusion: Digitalization in terms of time use from a gender perspective. Social Inclusion. 2020;8(2):180–189.
3. Borg K., Boulet M., Smith L. et al. Digital inclusion & health communication: A rapid review of literature. Health Commun. 2019;34(11):1320–1328.
4. Lai J., Widmar N. O. Revisiting the digital divide in the COVID-19 era. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021;43(1):458‒464.
5. Thompson K. M., Paul A. Factors of digital inclusion among women: Revisiting India and extending to Chile and Australia for additional analysis. The Library Quarterly. 2020;90(2):173–188.
6. Кульпин С. В., Савчук Г. А., Якимова О. А. Региональный анализ цифровой инклюзии на российском рынке С2С // Экономика региона. 2022. Т. 18, № 2. С. 437–449.
7. Karpunina E., Zabelina O., Lupacheva S. et al. Assessment of interregional divides in digital development as a basis for the policy of overcoming the Russia’s digital lag. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2023;23(2).
8. Karpunina E. K., Arutyunova A. E., Sazanova E. V. et al. Digitalisation determinants and digital dividends of the higher education system (on the exam-ple of Russia). International Journal of Education Economics and Development. 2022;13(4):392–409.
9. Molchan A. S., Osadchuk L. M., Anichkina O. A. et al. The “Digitalisation trap” of Russian regions. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2023;23(1):20‒41.
10. Karpunina E. K., Magomaeva L. R., Kochyan G. A. et al. Digital inequality and forms of its appearance: A comparative analysis in the OECD and BRICS countries. In: Proceedings of the 37th IBIMA conference, May 30–31, 2021, Cordoba, Spain. Cordoba: IBIMA Publishing; 2021 p. 1028–1039.
11. Головина Т. А., Хорольская Т. Е., Мусостов З. Р. Политика цифровой инклюзии в развитии человеческого капитала // Естественно-гуманитарные исследования. 2022. № 43. С. 77–83.
12. Шабунова А. А., Груздева М. А., Калачикова О. Н. Поселенческий аспект цифрового неравенства в современной России // Проблемы развития территории. 2020. № 4. С. 7–19.
13. Дубинина М. Г. Неравномерность развития цифровой экономики в федеральных округах Российской Федерации // Управление наукой и наукометрия. 2019. Т. 14, № 3. С. 368‒399.
14. Moskovtceva L. V., Pilipchuk N. V., Khashir B. O. et al. Development of digital regional ecosystems: Russian specifics and risk leveling. In: Popkova E. G., Sozinova A. A., editors. AgroTech. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 79–87.
15. Карпунина Е. К., Кузнецов Ю. В., Юшкова С. Д. и др. Цифровая трансформация хозяйственных систем: новые возможности и риски : коллект. моногр. М. : Русайнс, 2022. 273 с.
16. Александров И. Н., Федорова М. Ю. Влияние цифровой экономики на саморазвитие сельских территорий (на примере регионов Северо-Западного федерального округа России) // Проблемы современной экономики. 2019. № 3. С. 246–250.
17. Thomas J., Barraket J., Wilson C. et al. Measuring Australia’s digital divide: The Australian digital inclusion index 2017, RMIT University, Melbourne, for Telstra. Melbourne; 2017. 47 p.
18. Субраманиам Й., Масрон Т. А., Хадиян Н. и др. Цифровой разрыв в развивающихся странах // Вестник международных организаций. 2020. Т. 15, № 4. С. 115–139.
19. Авдеева И. Л. Цифровая трансформация экономических систем: итоги и перспективы развития // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2021. Т. 16, № 1. С. 226–239.
20. Banerjee A., Duflo E., Imbert C. et al. E-governance, accountability, and leakage in public programs: Experimental evidence from a financial management reform in India. NBER Working Paper No. 22803. Cambridge, MA; 2016. 52 p. URL: https://www.nber.org/ papers/w22803.pdf (дата обращения: 12.03.2023).
21. Dudek H. Determinants of access to the internet in households – Probit model analysis. Studia i Materiały Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą. 2007;(11):51–56.
22. Townsend L., Wallace C., Fairhurst G. Stuck out here: The critical role of broadband for remote rural places. Scottish Geographical Journal. 2015;131(3‒4):171‒180.
23. Итоги федерального статистического наблюдения по вопросам использования населением информационных технологий и информационно-телекоммуникационных сетей // Федеральная служба государственной статистики : офиц. сайт. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/infocommunity (дата обращения: 12.03.2023).
24. Karpunina E. K., Ruzhanskaya N. V., Podorova-Anikina O. N. et al. Transformation of consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Popkova E. G., Sergi B. S., editors. Geo-economy of the future: Sustainable agriculture and alternative energy. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 85–96.
25. Podorova-Anikina O. N., Karpunina E. K., Gukasyan Z. O. et al. E-commerce market: Intensification of development during the pandemic. In: Popkova E. G., editor. Proceedings of the Conference “Imitation Market Modeling in Digital Economy: Game Theoretic Approaches”. ISC 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 368. 2022. p. 363–373.
Review
For citations:
Plyasova S.V., Yazykova S.V., Konishchev E.V., Araslanbaev I.V. THEORETICAL AND METHODICAL BASE FOR STUDYING DIGITAL INCLUSION IN RUSSIA. Surgut State University Journal. 2023;11(2):46-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35266/2312-3419-2023-2-46-60